Choice and Individual Freedom in The Stranger (The Outsider) :: Camus Stranger Essays

Decision and Individual Freedom in The Stranger         Camus' The Stranger is an inauspicious calling that decision and person opportunity are vital segments of human instinct, and the responsibility and obligation that go with these components are eventually the central elements of the ethical quality of one's existence.  Meursault is put in an unconcerned world, a world that grasps silliness and oppresss reason; such is the idea of existentialist conviction, that legitimization and rationale are at last the quintessence of humankind, and that cultural hunches and an unessential business as usual serve just to sustain a misguided feeling of truth.         Meursault's prudence, just as his demise, lies in his exceptional propensity to pick, and in this manner exist, without processing target gauges or all inclusive sentiment.  His  unemotional, accepted existentialism is an impetus for perpetual strife between his justification and rationale based presence and that of others, which centers around a target membership to the standard ; such is obvious in warmed conversations with the justice and jail serve, who are seen as paragons of invalid rationale and the impractical, semi enthusiastic quest for old similarity.         No windmills are slain1 in this reproduced presence; foolishness of a distinctive kind commands the mainstream attitude, one which would estrange a man in light of his apparent lack of interest towards the unremarkable, and attempt, convict, and execute a man dependent on his absence of implied compassion towards the immaterial. Regard for the preliminary succession will uncover that the key components of the conviction had little to do with the genuine wrongdoing Meursault had submitted, yet rather  the unspeakable barbarities he had submitted while in grieving of his mother's passing, which comprised of smoking a cigarette, drinking some espresso, also, neglecting to cry or show up adequately distraught.  Indeed, the twisted confusion of good truth which the jury [society] looks for depends on a confined, target perception of right or wrong, in this way distorting the goals of equity by neglecting to perceive that individual flexibility and decision are ...the embodiment of individual presence and the integral factor of one's morality.2         The execution of Meursault at the end of the novel emblematically brings